Is US fighting force big enough? | csmonitor.com: "Is US fighting force big enough?
America needs a bigger military to stabilize weak or potentially threatening nations, some analysts argue.
By Gordon Lubold | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
from the October 14, 2008 edition
E-mail Print Letter to the Editor Republish del.icio.us digg
Reporter head shot
Reporter Gordon Lubold discusses the huge difference between the number of military and State Department officials in Iraq.
Washington - American's armed forces are growing bigger to reduce the strains from seven years of war, but if the US is confronting an era of 'persistent conflict,' as some experts believe, it will need an even bigger military.
A larger military could more easily conduct military and nation-building operations around the world. But whether the American public has the appetite to pursue and pay for such a foreign-policy agenda, especially after more than five years of an unpopular war in Iraq, is far from clear.
Last week, the Army released a new manual on 'stability operations' that outlines for the Army a prominent global role as a nation-builder. The service will maintain its ability to fight conventional land wars, but the manual's release signals that it expects future conflicts to look more like Iraq or Afghanistan than World War II. While Defense Secretary Rob"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment